From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Downey v. Mazzioli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 8, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 1610 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

438

03-08-2016

Barrett C. Downey, 22829/14E Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anne Marie K. Mazzioli, Defendant, Orfelina D. Jorge, et al., Defendants-Respondents.

Reardon & Sclafani, P.C., Tarrytown (Michael V. Sclafani of counsel), for appellant. Russo, Apoznanski & Tambasco, Melville (Gerard Ferrara of counsel), for respondents.


Reardon & Sclafani, P.C., Tarrytown (Michael V. Sclafani of counsel), for appellant.

Russo, Apoznanski & Tambasco, Melville (Gerard Ferrara of counsel), for respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Sharon A.M. Aarons, J.), entered February 13, 2015, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability as against defendants Orfelina D. Jorge and Julio C. Jorge (collectively Jorge), unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted.

Plaintiff made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of Jorge's liability, by submitting his affidavit averring that Jorge's vehicle struck the vehicle owned and operated by defendant Mazzioli in the rear, while plaintiff was a passenger in Mazzioli's vehicle (see Asante v Williams, 227 AD2d 123 [1st Dept 1996]). The potential issue of apportionment of fault as between Jorge and Mazzioli does not restrict plaintiff's right to partial summary judgment on the issue of liability as against the former (see Davis v Turner, 132 AD3d 603 [1st Dept 2015]; Couillard v Shaw Envtl. & Infrastructure Eng'g of N.Y., P.C., 125 AD3d 509 [1st Dept 2015]). The court properly rejected Jorge's contention that plaintiff's motion was premature, since "[t]he mere hope that evidence sufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment may be uncovered during the discovery process is insufficient to deny such a motion" (Davis at 603). Nor does defendant Jorge's attorney's affirmation satisfy defendant's burden of establishing a nonnegligent explanation for the rear-end collision.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: MARCH 8, 2016

DEPUTY CLERK


Summaries of

Downey v. Mazzioli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 8, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 1610 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Downey v. Mazzioli

Case Details

Full title:Barrett C. Downey, 22829/14E Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anne Marie K…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 8, 2016

Citations

2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 1610 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)