From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Downey v. Holding Comp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 16, 2006
34 A.D.3d 318 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

9576.

November 16, 2006.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold B. Beeler, J.), entered February 16, 2006, which denied plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment as to liability under Labor Law § 240, and denied the cross motion of defendant Local 46 Second Holding Corporation, sued herein as Local 46 2nd Holding Company, for summary judgment on its cross claims for common-law and contractual indemnification, unanimously affirmed, with separate bills of cost in favor of defendants payable by plaintiff.

Before: Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Nardelli, Catterson and Malone, JJ.


Recovery under the absolute liability provisions of Labor Law § 240 (1) requires a showing that the plaintiff "was hired by someone, be it owner, contractor or their agent" ( Whelen v Warwick Val. Civic Social Club, 47 NY2d 970, 971 [1979]). Questions of fact as to plaintiff's employment status preclude summary disposition.

Similarly, there is an issue of fact as to indemnification. The motion was premature, having been brought prior to the preliminary conference or the opportunity of the parties to conduct discovery ( Bradley v Ibex Constr. LLC, 22 AD3d 380 [2005]).

We have considered the parties' remaining arguments for affirmative relief and find them without merit.


Summaries of

Downey v. Holding Comp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 16, 2006
34 A.D.3d 318 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Downey v. Holding Comp

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN DOWNEY, Appellant-Respondent, v. LOCAL 46 2ND HOLDING COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 16, 2006

Citations

34 A.D.3d 318 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 8330
824 N.Y.S.2d 267