From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Downes-Patterson Corp. v. First National Supermarkets

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Sep 20, 2001
258 Conn. 917 (Conn. 2001)

Opinion

Decided September 20, 2001


The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 64 Conn. App. 417 (AC 20506), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Was the Appellate Court correct in determining that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in setting aside the jury's verdict on the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act count on the basis that the defendant was under no duty to release the restrictive covenant?

"2. Was the Appellate Court correct in determining that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in setting aside the jury's verdict on the tortious interference count on the basis that the defendant was under no duty to release the restrictive covenant?

"3. Did the Appellate Court usurp the jury's fact-finding function by ignoring evidence sufficient to support the jury's fact-finding function?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16585.

Robert M. Shields, Jr., Wesley W. Horton and Michael J. Quinn, in support of the petition.

Everett E. Newton, in opposition.


Summaries of

Downes-Patterson Corp. v. First National Supermarkets

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Sep 20, 2001
258 Conn. 917 (Conn. 2001)
Case details for

Downes-Patterson Corp. v. First National Supermarkets

Case Details

Full title:DOWNES-PATTERSON CORPORATION ET AL. v. FIRST NATIONAL SUPERMARKETS, INC

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Sep 20, 2001

Citations

258 Conn. 917 (Conn. 2001)
782 A.2d 1242

Citing Cases

Rosenblit v. Hartford Hospital

" [D]efendants [do] not violate CUTPA by failing to disclose information when they were under no legal…

Roscoe v. Elim Park Baptist Home, Inc.

Generally, the existence of a duty is not a prerequisite to a finding of tortious interference, which…