From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Downer v. Cramer

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 30, 2007
No. CIV S 06-1479 RRB CMK P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S 06-1479 RRB CMK P.

November 30, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's November 6, 2007 request for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice to a renewal of the motion at a later stage of the proceedings.


Summaries of

Downer v. Cramer

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 30, 2007
No. CIV S 06-1479 RRB CMK P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2007)
Case details for

Downer v. Cramer

Case Details

Full title:COLLIE GEORGE DOWNER, Petitioner, v. M. CRAMER, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 30, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S 06-1479 RRB CMK P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2007)