From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dowling v. XCEL Energy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 30, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03173-REB-KMT (D. Colo. Dec. 30, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03173-REB-KMT

12-30-2011

THERESA L. DOWLING, Plaintiff, v. XCEL ENERGY, Defendant.


Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya


ORDER OF RECUSAL

This matter comes before me sua sponte. To eschew the appearance of impropriety, I conclude that I must recuse myself from this case.

Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 455(a) provides, "(a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned." See United States v. Pearson, 203 F.3d 1243, 1264 (10th Cir. 2000). However, a "judge should not recuse himself on unsupported, irrational, or highly tenuous speculation." Hinman v. Rogers, 831 F.2d. 937, 939 (10th Cir. 1987).

One of my family members owns stock in Xcel Energy. Under these circumstances, the court's impartiality might reasonably be questioned.

Therefore, it is ORDERED:

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455(a), I hereby RECUSE myself from all further involvement in this case. The Clerk's Office shall randomly draw and assign another Magistrate Judge to this case.

BY THE COURT:

_____________________

Kathleen M. Tafoya

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Dowling v. XCEL Energy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 30, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03173-REB-KMT (D. Colo. Dec. 30, 2011)
Case details for

Dowling v. XCEL Energy

Case Details

Full title:THERESA L. DOWLING, Plaintiff, v. XCEL ENERGY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Dec 30, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03173-REB-KMT (D. Colo. Dec. 30, 2011)