From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dowling v. Xcel Energy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 17, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03173-REB-MEH (D. Colo. Apr. 17, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03173-REB-MEH

04-17-2012

THERESA L. DOWLING, Plaintiff, v. XCEL ENERGY, Defendant.


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty , United States Magistrate Judge, on April 17, 2012.

Plaintiff's Motion to Join Parties [filed April 13, 2012; docket #29] is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A. The Court reminds the parties that it "will not consider any motion, other than a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 or 56, unless counsel for the moving party or a pro se party, before filing the motion, has conferred or made reasonable, good-faith efforts to confer with opposing counsel. " D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A (emphasis added). It is the responsibility of the moving party to "state in the motion, or in a certificate attached to the motion, the specific efforts to comply with this rule..." Id.


Summaries of

Dowling v. Xcel Energy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 17, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03173-REB-MEH (D. Colo. Apr. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Dowling v. Xcel Energy

Case Details

Full title:THERESA L. DOWLING, Plaintiff, v. XCEL ENERGY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Apr 17, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03173-REB-MEH (D. Colo. Apr. 17, 2012)