From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dowling v. Birnbaum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 3, 1969
31 A.D.2d 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Opinion

March 3, 1969


In an action to recover damages for wrongful death and conscious pain and suffering, defendant Lippman appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 13, 1968, which denied his motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute, pursuant to CPLR 3216. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. We feel the extraordinary combination of misfortunes which affected plaintiff's surviving attorney was responsible for the delay in prosecuting the action; and, absent any substantial prejudice to appellant, the interests of justice warranted the learned Special Term in denying the motion. Brennan, Acting P.J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dowling v. Birnbaum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 3, 1969
31 A.D.2d 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
Case details for

Dowling v. Birnbaum

Case Details

Full title:HENRY DOWLING, as Administrator of the Estate of VIOLA ABLES, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 3, 1969

Citations

31 A.D.2d 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Citing Cases

Norowitz v. Ponconco, Inc.

The mental illness which disabled plaintiff's former counsel was corroborated by a letter from his…

Hargett v. Health Hospitals Corporation

This was accompanied by her attorney's affirmation stating that the default was due to his being taken ill…