From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dowdy v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Oct 6, 1931
136 So. 926 (Ala. Crim. App. 1931)

Opinion

8 Div. 396.

August 4, 1931. Rehearing Denied October 6, 1931.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lauderdale County; J. Fred Johnson, Jr., Judge.

Defendant was convicted on a charge of manufacturing whisky.

F. S. Parnell, of Florence, for appellant.

Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., for the State.


We have read the record in this case and considered the exceptions reserved on the trial. The evidence was in sharp conflict, making the question of guilt one of fact for the jury.

The cause was submitted in this court on motion of the Attorney General, without brief or argument by appellant supporting exceptions reserved on the trial and set out in the record, or pointing out wherein the record is supposed to show error prejudicial to appellant.

We have examined the record for errors, as the statute requires, and find none prejudicial to defendant. Without promulgating an opinion, which we deem unnecessary, the judgment is affirmed. Simmons v. State, 17 Ala. App. 153, 82 So. 643; Grisham v. State, 17 Ala. App. 153, 82 So. 643.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Dowdy v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Oct 6, 1931
136 So. 926 (Ala. Crim. App. 1931)
Case details for

Dowdy v. State

Case Details

Full title:Comer DOWDY v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Oct 6, 1931

Citations

136 So. 926 (Ala. Crim. App. 1931)
136 So. 926