From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dowdle v. Florida Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 2, 1966
183 So. 2d 685 (Fla. 1966)

Opinion

No. 34778.

March 2, 1966.

Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

Masterson, Lloyd Rogers, St. Petersburg, for petitioner.

Billy L. Rowe, of Mann, Harrison, Mann Rowe, St. Petersburg, for Pinellas County Board of Public Instruction and Pacific Indemnity Co.

James E. Thompson, of Fowler, White, Gillen, Humkey Trenam, Tampa, for Pinellas County Board of Public Instruction and American Employers Insurance Co.

Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission.


By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date August 17, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition for writ of certiorari and the petition for attorneys' fees are both therefore denied.

THORNAL, C.J., and ROBERTS, DREW, O'CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dowdle v. Florida Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 2, 1966
183 So. 2d 685 (Fla. 1966)
Case details for

Dowdle v. Florida Industrial Commission

Case Details

Full title:EZEKIEL J. DOWDLE, PETITIONER, v. FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, PINELLAS…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Mar 2, 1966

Citations

183 So. 2d 685 (Fla. 1966)