From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dow Chemical Canada Inc. v. HRD Corporation

United States District Court, D. Delaware
Nov 20, 2009
Civil Action No. 05-023-JJF (D. Del. Nov. 20, 2009)

Summary

ruling that, in order to properly obtain discovery that defendant was pursuing through its subpoenas, after discovery period closed, it was required to make a 'good cause' application to the Court, and to demonstrate that the discovery sought could not have been obtained within the allowed discovery period

Summary of this case from Galloway v. Islands Mech. Contractor, Inc.

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-023-JJF.

November 20, 2009


ORDER


WHEREAS, the Special Master issued a Report and Recommendation (D.I. 381) dated July 17, 2009, concerning Dow's Request For Production;

WHEREAS, no Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed;

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Special Master's Report and Recommendation (D.I. 381) is ADOPTED.


Summaries of

Dow Chemical Canada Inc. v. HRD Corporation

United States District Court, D. Delaware
Nov 20, 2009
Civil Action No. 05-023-JJF (D. Del. Nov. 20, 2009)

ruling that, in order to properly obtain discovery that defendant was pursuing through its subpoenas, after discovery period closed, it was required to make a 'good cause' application to the Court, and to demonstrate that the discovery sought could not have been obtained within the allowed discovery period

Summary of this case from Galloway v. Islands Mech. Contractor, Inc.
Case details for

Dow Chemical Canada Inc. v. HRD Corporation

Case Details

Full title:DOW CHEMICAL CANADA INC., on its behalf and as assignee of THE DOW…

Court:United States District Court, D. Delaware

Date published: Nov 20, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-023-JJF (D. Del. Nov. 20, 2009)

Citing Cases

Galloway v. Islands Mech. Contractor, Inc.

Plaintiff never moved to modify the Scheduling Order, and never offered any reason why he did not seek the…