From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dover v. Underwood

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Oct 18, 2010
Civil Action No. 2:10-CV-499-ID (WO) (M.D. Ala. Oct. 18, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2:10-CV-499-ID (WO).

October 18, 2010


ORDER


This cause is now before the Court on Plaintiff's Notice of Appeal which this Court construes to contain a request for a certificate of appealability and a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. (Doc. #17).

Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(a) provides that "[a]n appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith." In making this determination as to good faith, a court must use an objective standard, such as whether the appeal is "frivolous," Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445, 82 S. Ct. 917, 921 (1962), or "has no substantive merit." United States v. Bottoson, 644 F.2d 1174, 1176 (5th Cir. Unit B May 15, 1981) (per curiam), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 903, 102 S. Ct. 411 (1981); see also Rudolph v. Allen, 666 F.2d 519, 520 (11th Cir. 1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1122, 102 S. Ct. 2938 (1982); Morris v. Ross, 663 F.2d 1032 (11th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1010, 102 S. Ct. 2303 (1982).

See Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206 (11th Cir. 1981) ( en banc) (adopting as binding precedent all of the decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to the close of business on September 30, 1981).

The Plaintiff's complaint was initially dismissed without prejudice to allow the Plaintiff to proceed with his claims before the state court where the Plaintiff had also filed. The Plaintiff's apparent basis for his current appeal is that he no longer has a case pending in state court. (Doc. #17). Applying the "good faith" standard set forth above, the Court finds that the Plaintiff's appeal is without an appropriate legal or factual basis and, accordingly, is frivolous and not taken in good faith. See, e.g., Rudolph v. Allan, supra; Brown v. Pena, 441 F. Supp. 1382 (S.D. Fla. 1977), aff'd without opinion, 589 F.2d 1113 (5th Cir. 1979).

Accordingly, it is CONSIDERED and ORDERED

1. that the Plaintiff's request for a certificate of appealability (Doc. #17) be and the same is hereby DENIED;

2. that the Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Doc. #17) be and the same is hereby DENIED; and

3. that the Plaintiff's appeal be and the same is hereby CERTIFIED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(a), as not taken in good faith.

Done this the 18th day of October, 2010.


Summaries of

Dover v. Underwood

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Oct 18, 2010
Civil Action No. 2:10-CV-499-ID (WO) (M.D. Ala. Oct. 18, 2010)
Case details for

Dover v. Underwood

Case Details

Full title:LARRY DOVER, #217 258, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER RODERICK UNDERWOOD, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division

Date published: Oct 18, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 2:10-CV-499-ID (WO) (M.D. Ala. Oct. 18, 2010)