From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Douglass v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Nov 15, 1927
114 So. 479 (Ala. Crim. App. 1927)

Opinion

2 Div. 381.

November 15, 1927.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Choctaw County; T. J. Bedsole, Judge.

Earnest Douglass was convicted of reckless driving of an automobile, and he appeals. Reversed and remanded.

D. M. Boswell, of York, for appellant.

The guilt of the defendant must be fully proven. The jury must be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant is guilty. Tool v. State, 21 Ala. App. 233, 107 So. 36; Moore v. State, 71 Ala. 307.

Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.

Brief did not reach the Reporter.


It would serve no good purpose to review this record in detail. It is sufficient to say generally that the evidence in this case should have been confined and limited to facts affecting the act of the defendant at the time and place of the alleged commission of the offense. Evidence of the speed at which defendant was driving his truck at other times and places was irrelevant. When this evidence is eliminated there is an entire absence of evidence authorizing a conviction. The general charge as requested by defendant should have been given. Gladden v. State, ante, p. 85, 112 So. 541.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Douglass v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Nov 15, 1927
114 So. 479 (Ala. Crim. App. 1927)
Case details for

Douglass v. State

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLASS v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Nov 15, 1927

Citations

114 So. 479 (Ala. Crim. App. 1927)
22 Ala. App. 255

Citing Cases

Harter v. King

This testimony was immaterial and irrelevant and we think under the facts in this case, the plaintiff was…

Graham v. State

The verdict was contrary to the weight of evidence. Robinson v. State, 30 Ala. App. 12, 200 So. 626; Browning…