From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DOUGLASS v. HOBE

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1899
36 App. Div. 638 (N.Y. App. Div. 1899)

Opinion

January Term, 1899.


Judgment reversed, with costs, and new trial granted in Municipal Court.


This is an action for conversion. The plaintiff established upon the trial that he had a chattel mortgage upon certain property in a place of business carried on by Mrs. Fenstermaker, the maker of the mortgage, and that the same was given to secure the payment of certain promissory notes. These notes were not paid at maturity, and the mortgagor abandoned the property, and the same came into the possession of the defendant Hobe, who, upon demand made upon him, refused to deliver the articles. The undisputed evidence established a case of conversion, but as the plaintiff gave no evidence of the value of the property, he was only entitled, upon the proof, to nominal damages. To such damages he was entitled, and it was, therefore, error in the justice to dismiss his complaint. The judgment should be reversed, with costs, and a new trial granted in the Municipal Court. All concurred.


Summaries of

DOUGLASS v. HOBE

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1899
36 App. Div. 638 (N.Y. App. Div. 1899)
Case details for

DOUGLASS v. HOBE

Case Details

Full title:Earle B. Douglass, Appellant, v. George A. Hobe and Mary Decker, the Name…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1899

Citations

36 App. Div. 638 (N.Y. App. Div. 1899)

Citing Cases

GOODRICH SILVERTOWN STORES v. DE KALB MOTOR CO

Any appropriation or sale or other disposition of, or exercise of dominion over, personal property of…