From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Douglas v. Stevens

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 27, 2011
No. CIV S-09-3412 KJM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-3412 KJM GGH P

09-27-2011

BRYAN ANTHONY DOUGLAS, Plaintiff, v. B. STEVENS, Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On August 11, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations to which defendant has filed a reply.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 11, 2011, are adopted in full; and

2. Defendant's motion for summary judgment, filed on February 24, 2011 (ECF 37), is granted.

____________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Douglas v. Stevens

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 27, 2011
No. CIV S-09-3412 KJM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2011)
Case details for

Douglas v. Stevens

Case Details

Full title:BRYAN ANTHONY DOUGLAS, Plaintiff, v. B. STEVENS, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 27, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-09-3412 KJM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2011)