From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Douglas v. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nov 4, 2009
335 F. App'x 49 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

Summary

describing statutory bases for broad authority of Secretary to develop the record, including by scheduling a veteran for a medical examination

Summary of this case from Herbert v. McDonald

Opinion

No. 2009-7037.

November 4, 2009.

On Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, No. 06-0482; William P. Greene, Jr., Chief Judge.

Kenneth M. Carpenter, Carpenter, Chartered, of Topeka, Kansas argued for claimant-appellant.

Hillary A. Stern, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. With her on the brief were Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Brian M. Simkin, Deputy Director. Of counsel on the brief was Michael J. Timinski, Deputy Assistant General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, of Washington, DC.

MAYER, LOURIE and RADER, Circuit Judges.


Judgment


This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

Douglas v. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nov 4, 2009
335 F. App'x 49 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

describing statutory bases for broad authority of Secretary to develop the record, including by scheduling a veteran for a medical examination

Summary of this case from Herbert v. McDonald
Case details for

Douglas v. Shinseki

Case Details

Full title:Jerry W. DOUGLAS, Claimant-Appellant, v. Eric K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Nov 4, 2009

Citations

335 F. App'x 49 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Herbert v. McDonald

Mr. Herbert does not argue that the Secretary lacks authority outside § 5103A to take steps to develop the…