From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Douglas v. Maxwell

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 4, 1963
194 N.E.2d 576 (Ohio 1963)

Opinion

No. 38309

Decided December 4, 1963.

Habeas corpus — Relief not available, when — No denial of constitutional rights — Preliminary hearing — Right to counsel.

IN HABEAS CORPUS.

This is an action in habeas corpus originating in this court. Petitioner, Odus Douglas, was indicted by the Grand Jury of Cuyahoga County for armed robbery on October 31, 1961. He pleaded not guilty, and an attorney was appointed to represent him. A jury found him guilty, and he is presently confined in the penitentiary on his sentence for armed robbery.

Mr. Odus Douglas, in propria persona. Mr. William B. Saxbe, attorney general, and Mr. William C. Baird, for respondent.


Petitioner's primary contention in this case is that he was denied a proper preliminary hearing, and thus the trial court never obtained jurisdiction over him. Although petitioner admits to a preliminary hearing, he contends it was purely a sham.

The jurisdiction of the trial court arises from the return of the indictment and not from the preliminary hearing. Even if petitioner had been completely denied a preliminary hearing he would not be entitled to release. White v. Maxwell, Warden, 174 Ohio St. 186; and Crider v. Maxwell, Warden, 174 Ohio St. 190.

Petitioner urges also that he was denied his constitutional rights because the court did not appoint an attorney prior to his preliminary hearing. The failure to appoint counsel prior to the preliminary hearing does not deprive an accused of any constitutional rights. Dean v. Maxwell, Warden, 174 Ohio St. 193. The petitioner in the present case has been denied none of his constitutional rights.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

TAFT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, MATTHIAS, O'NEILL, GRIFFITH, HERBERT and GIBSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Douglas v. Maxwell

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 4, 1963
194 N.E.2d 576 (Ohio 1963)
Case details for

Douglas v. Maxwell

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS v. MAXWELL, WARDEN

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Dec 4, 1963

Citations

194 N.E.2d 576 (Ohio 1963)
194 N.E.2d 576

Citing Cases

State v. McDougald

However, in cases such as this one where Defendant has been charged with a felony offense, which may only be…

State v. McCoy

We noted in McDougald that "in cases such as this one where Defendant has been charged with a felony offense,…