From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Douglas v. Florida Parole Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 17, 1998
710 So. 2d 142 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 97-1333

Opinion filed April 17, 1998 JANUARY TERM 1998

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, William C. Johnson, Jr., Judge.

James E. Douglas, Daytona Beach, Pro Se.

Kim M. Fluharty, Assistant General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


James Douglas (defendant) appeals the trial court's order denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus. In the petition, the defendant contended that the cancellation of his control release credits by the Department of Corrections was an ex post facto application of law. We affirm. To be an ex post facto application, the law must apply to events occurring before its enactment. See Weaver v. Graham, 450 U.S. 24, 28-30 (1981). In this case, at the time he committed his crime and was sentenced as an habitual offender, the defendant was not entitled to control release credits. See § 947.146(4) (e), Fla. Stat. (1989). Thus, the cancellation of control release credits pursuant to section 947.146(3) (g), Florida Statutes (1995), was not an ex post facto application of law.

AFFIRMED.

COBB, SHARP, W., and ANTOON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Douglas v. Florida Parole Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 17, 1998
710 So. 2d 142 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Douglas v. Florida Parole Commission

Case Details

Full title:JAMES E. DOUGLAS, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Apr 17, 1998

Citations

710 So. 2d 142 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Floyd v. State

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Douglas v. Florida Parole Commission, 710 So.2d 142 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). GRIFFIN, C.J.,…

Douglas v. Florida Parole Com'n

September 11, 1998. 5th DCA 710 So.2d 142. Flordia Decisions without Published Opinions,…