From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Douglas v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 7, 2013
104 A.D.3d 981 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-03-7

In the Matter of David DOUGLAS Sr., Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

David Douglas Sr., Marcy, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.



David Douglas Sr., Marcy, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.
Before: MERCURE, J.P., ROSE, STEIN and GARRY, JJ.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Following the receipt of a threatening letter purportedly sent to the Governor by another inmate, investigators tested the envelope flap and found petitioner's DNA. Petitioner was accused of violating various prison disciplinary rules as a result and, after a tier III disciplinary hearing, was found guilty of impersonation, violating facility correspondence procedures and making threats. His administrative appeal was unsuccessful, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

The misbehavior report, testing documentation and hearing testimony provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Cruz v. Bezio, 79 A.D.3d 1509, 1509, 912 N.Y.S.2d 466 [2010];Matter of Devaughn v. Bezio, 75 A.D.3d 673, 673–674, 903 N.Y.S.2d 271 [2010] ). Contrary to petitioner's further contention, written documents and the testimony of an investigator from the Inspector General's office detailed the tests performed on the envelope and letter, and any further testimony regarding them was properly denied as redundant and/or irrelevant ( see Matter of Antinuche v. Goord, 16 A.D.3d 743, 744, 790 N.Y.S.2d 324 [2005] ). His remaining arguments have been considered and found to be wanting in merit.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Douglas v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 7, 2013
104 A.D.3d 981 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Douglas v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of David DOUGLAS Sr., Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 7, 2013

Citations

104 A.D.3d 981 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
104 A.D.3d 981
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 1448

Citing Cases

Injah Unique Tafari v. Annucci

We reach a different conclusion, however, with regard to the remainder of the determination. The misbehavior…