From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Douglas v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division
Oct 11, 2011
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00008-MP-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Oct. 11, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00008-MP-GRJ.

October 11, 2011


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Doc. 23, Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, recommending that the decision of the Commissioner, denying benefits, be affirmed. The time for filing objections has passed, and none have been filed. Upon consideration, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that the ALJ properly relied upon the plaintiff's past relevant work as an office helper while on work release, and also properly found that plaintiff could perform other jobs. Moreover, the Court agrees that substantial evidence supported the ALJ's decision that plaintiff's complaints regarding the severity of his pain were not credible. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

DONE AND ORDERED.

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted and incorporated herein.
2. The decision of the Commissioner, denying benefits, is affirmed.


Summaries of

Douglas v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division
Oct 11, 2011
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00008-MP-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Oct. 11, 2011)
Case details for

Douglas v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ROSCOE DOUGLAS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J ASTRUE, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division

Date published: Oct 11, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00008-MP-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Oct. 11, 2011)