Opinion
May, 1918.
Judgment reversed and verdict reinstated, with costs, upon the ground that the note itself in evidence shows a consideration. Jenks, P.J., Thomas, Rich and Blackmar, JJ., concurred; Putnam, J., dissented on the ground that the note, given to an eight-year-old child, with the accompanying testimony, negatives any legal consideration, and the circumstances displace the ordinary presumption from the formula "for value received."