From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dougherty v. McKelheer

Supreme Court of Colorado. In Department
Sep 25, 1967
431 P.2d 863 (Colo. 1967)

Opinion

No. 21918.

Decided September 25, 1967.

Action by payee against maker to recover amount claimed to be due on a promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff.

Affirmed.

Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Honorable Robert W. Steele, Judge.

Donald S. Molen, for plaintiff in error.

Lynch Groves, for defendant in error.


In an action brought by Hulda McKelheer a judgment was entered in her favor against Roger Dougherty for the sum of $2,329.39, which was the amount claimed to be due on a promissory note admittedly executed and delivered by Dougherty payable to McKelheer.

The points urged for reversal of the judgment, namely, that the trial court erred in denying a motion for change of venue, and that there was no evidence as to what the law of the State of Washington was with regard to the "validity of the promissory note," are without merit. No good purpose would be served in further comment.


The judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE SUTTON, MR. JUSTICE PRINGLE and MR. JUSTICE KELLEY concur.


Summaries of

Dougherty v. McKelheer

Supreme Court of Colorado. In Department
Sep 25, 1967
431 P.2d 863 (Colo. 1967)
Case details for

Dougherty v. McKelheer

Case Details

Full title:Roger Dougherty v. Hulda McKelheer

Court:Supreme Court of Colorado. In Department

Date published: Sep 25, 1967

Citations

431 P.2d 863 (Colo. 1967)
431 P.2d 863