From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dougherty v. Heller

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Jun 14, 2016
J-62-2016 (Pa. Jun. 14, 2016)

Opinion

J-62-2016 No. 6 EAP 2015

06-14-2016

JOHN J. DOUGHERTY, Appellant v. KAREN HELLER, Appellee


CHIEF JUSTICE SAYLOR, JUSTICE WECHT, AND JUDGES COLINS, FRIEDMAN, LEADBETTER, BROBSON, AND STRASSBURGER Appeal from the Judgment of the Superior Court entered on 8/14/14 at No. 1333 EDA 2012 affirming the order entered on 4/11/12 in the Court of Common Pleas, Civil Division, Philadelphia County at No. 00699 December Term 2009

CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION

SENIOR JUDGE FRIEDMAN

I join in parts I, II, and III of the majority opinion. I respectfully dissent from part IV of the majority and join the dissenting opinion of Judge Colins.

I write separately only to emphasize that based on the parties' protracted adversarial history, Appellant's fears are real and not speculative. From the evidence presented, I would conclude that because the harm alleged is more likely than not to occur, Appellant has established good cause, thus warranting the limited protective order requested.


Summaries of

Dougherty v. Heller

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Jun 14, 2016
J-62-2016 (Pa. Jun. 14, 2016)
Case details for

Dougherty v. Heller

Case Details

Full title:JOHN J. DOUGHERTY, Appellant v. KAREN HELLER, Appellee

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Jun 14, 2016

Citations

J-62-2016 (Pa. Jun. 14, 2016)