From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dougherty v. Grand Union Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 21, 1997
238 A.D.2d 465 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

April 21, 1997


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robbins, J.), dated July 29, 1994, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendant and against them, and (2) an order of the same court, dated August 3, 1994, which denied their motion, inter alia, to set aside the verdict.

Ordered that the judgment and the order are affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Because the plaintiffs failed to object to the allegedly prejudicial cross-examination, they have failed to preserve this issue for appellate review (see, CPLR 4017; Horton v. Smith, 51 N.Y.2d 798, 799; Zipkin v. City of New York, 196 A.D.2d 865, 866; Vavallo v. Consolidated Edison Co., 150 A.D.2d 556, 559; Picciallo v. Norchi, 147 A.D.2d 540, 540-541).

The plaintiffs' remaining contentions are without merit. Rosenblatt, J.P., Ritter, Thompson and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dougherty v. Grand Union Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 21, 1997
238 A.D.2d 465 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Dougherty v. Grand Union Company

Case Details

Full title:MARIA H. DOUGHERTY et al., Appellants, v. GRAND UNION COMPANY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 21, 1997

Citations

238 A.D.2d 465 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
657 N.Y.S.2d 921