From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dougherty v. Carlisle Transp. Prods., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jul 2, 2014
Civil No. - JFM-13-857 (M.D. Pa. Jul. 2, 2014)

Opinion

Civil No. - JFM-13-857

07-02-2014

KEITH DOUGHERTY, ET AL v. CARLISLE TRANSPORTATION PRODUCTS, INC.


MEMORANDUM

On March 21, 2014, I entered a memorandum and order dismissing claims filed by Keith Dougherty Investments & Consulting LLC and ordering that Carlisle Transportation Products Inc. ("CTP") be substituted as a proper defendant. CTP has now filed a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment. The motion will be granted. It is apparent from the papers filed in connection with CTP's motion that Keith Dougherty was not the personal assignee of any accounts receivable at Bill's Mechanical upon which this suit was based. Furthermore, to the extent that Dougherty is seeking to assert any rights held by Larry Runk, II, he is engaging in champerty and the unauthorized practice of law because the agreement between Dougherty and Runk provides that Dougherty will "provide recommendations and representations in the efforts to collect bad debt" in return for one third of the sums collected plus costs.

My granting of judgment in favor of CPT moots the other pending motions in this case.

__________

J. Frederick Motz

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Dougherty v. Carlisle Transp. Prods., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jul 2, 2014
Civil No. - JFM-13-857 (M.D. Pa. Jul. 2, 2014)
Case details for

Dougherty v. Carlisle Transp. Prods., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KEITH DOUGHERTY, ET AL v. CARLISLE TRANSPORTATION PRODUCTS, INC.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jul 2, 2014

Citations

Civil No. - JFM-13-857 (M.D. Pa. Jul. 2, 2014)