From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doty v. City of Broomfield

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 10, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01340-PAB-MJW (D. Colo. Dec. 10, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01340-PAB-MJW

12-10-2012

TIMOTHY DOTY, Plaintiff(s), v. CITY AND COUNTY of BROOMFIELD, BARBARA WISNIEWSKA, SGT. MIKE JONES, and STACEY JASPER, Defendant(s).


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

It is hereby ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion to Compel Disclosure of Computation of Economic Damages (docket no. 43) is DENIED for the following reasons. Plaintiff has already provided to Defendants his Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures. Furthermore, on December 5, 2012, Plaintiff provided to Defendant his Second Supplemental Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) Disclosure (docket no. 45-2). In addition, Plaintiff has provided to Defendants numerous signed releases for medical records and other documents (docket no. 45-1) and Plaintiff's 2009 federal income tax return (docket no. 45-3). Further, this court has allowed depositions to be taken by both sides, and the Defendants may take the deposition of Plaintiff to obtain any further information regarding damages claimed directly from the Plaintiff. See Rule 16 Scheduling Order. Lastly, both Plaintiff and Defendants are reminded of their duties to supplement their discovery responses.


Summaries of

Doty v. City of Broomfield

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 10, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01340-PAB-MJW (D. Colo. Dec. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Doty v. City of Broomfield

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY DOTY, Plaintiff(s), v. CITY AND COUNTY of BROOMFIELD, BARBARA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Dec 10, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01340-PAB-MJW (D. Colo. Dec. 10, 2012)