From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dotson v. Tunica-Biloxi Gaming Comm'n

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Mar 26, 2020
CASE NO. 1:18-CV-00885 (W.D. La. Mar. 26, 2020)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:18-CV-00885

03-26-2020

SHANNON DOTSON v. TUNICA-BILOXI GAMING COMMISSION


MAGISTRATE JUDGE PEREZ-MONTES

JUDGMENT

For the reasons expressed in the Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge filed previously herein and after independent (de novo) review of the entire record in this case, including the objections filed by plaintiff, the court ADOPTS the proposed findings and it is hereby

ORDERED that defendants' motions to dismiss (Doc. 51, 52) are GRANTED. Defendant's alternative motion for more definite statement (Doc. 51) is DENIED as MOOT. Accordingly, it is further

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that all claims by plaintiff against defendants Tunica-Biloxi Gaming Commission, Lori Piazza and Vocarro in the instant suit are DENIED AND DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further

ORDERED that plaintiff's pending motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum (Doc. 71) is DENIED as MOOT. Similarly, the motion to quash (Doc. 74) filed thereafter by defendant is DENIED as MOOT.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED this 26th day of March, 2020 at Alexandria, Louisiana.

/s/_________

DEE D. DRELL, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Dotson v. Tunica-Biloxi Gaming Comm'n

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Mar 26, 2020
CASE NO. 1:18-CV-00885 (W.D. La. Mar. 26, 2020)
Case details for

Dotson v. Tunica-Biloxi Gaming Comm'n

Case Details

Full title:SHANNON DOTSON v. TUNICA-BILOXI GAMING COMMISSION

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Mar 26, 2020

Citations

CASE NO. 1:18-CV-00885 (W.D. La. Mar. 26, 2020)