From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dotson v. Guano Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1935
182 S.E. 374 (N.C. 1935)

Opinion

(Filed 20 November, 1935.)

APPEAL by defendant from Clement, J., at March Term, 1935, of MECKLENBURG.

John M. Robinson and Marvin L. Ritch for plaintiff.

Willcox, Cooke Willcox and Tillett, Tillett Kennedy for defendant.


Civil action for breach of contract.

Verdict and judgment for plaintiff, from which the defendant appeals, assigning errors.


This is the same case that was before us at the Fall Term, 1934, when a partial new trial was granted, limited to the issue of damages, opinion filed 28 January, 1935, reported in 207 N.C. 635, 178 S.E. 100.

The second trial substantially accords with our former opinion. It is true, the evidence was somewhat different, due to the necessity of conforming to our interpretation of the contract, thus rendering the special prayer requested on the first hearing inappropriate, but we have discovered no reversible error on the present hearing.

No error.


Summaries of

Dotson v. Guano Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1935
182 S.E. 374 (N.C. 1935)
Case details for

Dotson v. Guano Co.

Case Details

Full title:ISAAC M. DOTSON v. F. S. ROYSTER GUANO COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Nov 1, 1935

Citations

182 S.E. 374 (N.C. 1935)
208 N.C. 852