From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dosty v. Swarthout

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 26, 2012
No. CIV S-10-1602 DAD (E.D. Cal. Apr. 26, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-1602 DAD

04-26-2012

JEROME ONTARIO DOSTY Petitioner, v. GARY SWARTHOUT Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. As directed, respondent filed an Answer on September 1, 2010. Therein, respondent cited the Clerk's Transcript and the unpublished California Court of Appeal opinion and stated an intention to lodge the state appellate record with this court. (Answer To Petition For Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 8), at 5). However, no such lodging was thereafter made in this court. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, within thirty days from the date of this order, Respondent shall lodge with this court the state appellate record.

____________

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DAD:an
Dosty1602.o


Summaries of

Dosty v. Swarthout

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 26, 2012
No. CIV S-10-1602 DAD (E.D. Cal. Apr. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Dosty v. Swarthout

Case Details

Full title:JEROME ONTARIO DOSTY Petitioner, v. GARY SWARTHOUT Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 26, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-10-1602 DAD (E.D. Cal. Apr. 26, 2012)