From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dorville v. Royal Farms, Inc.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Feb 20, 2019
169 A.D.3d 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

2016–05334 Index No.3165/14

02-20-2019

Domingo DORVILLE, Appellant, v. ROYAL FARMS, INC., Respondent.

Lipsig, Shapey, Manus & Moverman, P.C. (Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, LLP, New York, N.Y. [Brian J. Isaac, White Plains, and Michael H. Zhu ], of counsel), for appellant. White and Williams LLP, New York, N.Y. (Rafael Vergara of counsel), for respondent.


Lipsig, Shapey, Manus & Moverman, P.C. (Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, LLP, New York, N.Y. [Brian J. Isaac, White Plains, and Michael H. Zhu ], of counsel), for appellant.

White and Williams LLP, New York, N.Y. (Rafael Vergara of counsel), for respondent.

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, BETSY BARROS, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.

DECISION & ORDERIn an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Debra Silber, J.), dated April 21, 2016. The order denied the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action alleging a violation of Labor Law § 240(1) and granted the defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.ORDERED that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof granting the defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and substituting therefor a provision denying the cross motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Both parties' respective motions for summary judgment should have been denied, as there are triable issues of fact as to the nature of the task the plaintiff was performing at the time of the accident, and whether, under the circumstances, that task constituted one of the protected activities within the meaning of Labor Law § 240(1).

RIVERA, J.P., LEVENTHAL, BARROS and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dorville v. Royal Farms, Inc.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Feb 20, 2019
169 A.D.3d 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Dorville v. Royal Farms, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Domingo Dorville, appellant, v. Royal Farms, Inc., respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Feb 20, 2019

Citations

169 A.D.3d 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 1195
92 N.Y.S.3d 676

Citing Cases

Obas v. 64 Onderdonk Ave. LLC

"Essentially, routine maintenance for purposes of the statute is work that does not rise to the level of an…