From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dorty v. Reg'l Acceptance Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 27, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-cv-2359 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 27, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-cv-2359

02-27-2012

STEVEN DORTY Plaintiff v. REGIONAL ACCEPTANCE CORP. Defendant


(Chief Judge Kane)

(Magistrate Judge Smyser)


ORDER

Before the court in the captioned action is a February 6, 2012 report of the magistrate judge. No timely objections have been filed.

Accordingly, this 27th day of February, 2012, upon review of the record and the applicable law, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Smyser.
2) Defendant's motion (Doc. No. 4) to dismiss the original complaint or, in the alternative, for a more definite statement is denied as moot.
3) Plaintiff's motion (Doc. No. 6) for a change of venue is construed as a motion asking the court to decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction and remand the case to state court. The case is remanded to Magisterial District Court No. 39-3-06 in Franklin County, Pennsylvania.
4) The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE the case.

______________

YVETTE KANE, Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Dorty v. Reg'l Acceptance Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 27, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-cv-2359 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Dorty v. Reg'l Acceptance Corp.

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN DORTY Plaintiff v. REGIONAL ACCEPTANCE CORP. Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Feb 27, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-cv-2359 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 27, 2012)