From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dorsey v. Campbell

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 20, 2005
No. CIV S-05-1484 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2005)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-1484 FCD KJM P.

October 20, 2005


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


By an order filed July 29, 2005, petitioner was ordered to file an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the appropriate filing fee ($5.00) within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court's order and has not filed an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the appropriate filing fee ($5.00).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Dorsey v. Campbell

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 20, 2005
No. CIV S-05-1484 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2005)
Case details for

Dorsey v. Campbell

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE J. DORSEY, Petitioner, v. ROSEANNE CAMPBELL, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 20, 2005

Citations

No. CIV S-05-1484 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2005)