Dorsett v. State

Full title: ANTHONY DORSETT, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: Jun 3, 2015

166 So. 3d 898 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. 4D15–144.

2015-06-03

Anthony DORSETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Anthony Dorsett, Miami, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi , Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Matthew Steven Ocksrider , Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the SeventeenthJudicial Circuit, Broward County; Barbara McCarthy, Judge; L.T. Case No. 90–9870CF10B.
Anthony Dorsett, Miami, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Matthew Steven Ocksrider, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's denial of appellant's rule 3.800(a) motion. Johnson v. State, 60 So.3d 1045 (Fla.2011); Casteel v. State, 141 So.3d 624 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). “[R]eview of the record establishes that the defendant did not satisfy the burden of showing entitlement to relief on the face of the record.” Johnson, 60 So.3d at 1051 n. 2. Appellant's second claim is meritless as the alleged disproportionality between his sentence, and the sentence of his co-defendant, does not establish an “illegal sentence” cognizable under rule 3.800(a). Shivers v. State, 96 So.3d 1039, 1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

Affirmed.

GERBER, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.