From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dornbusch v. Board Adjustment, Newark

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 22, 1937
189 A. 52 (N.J. 1937)

Opinion

Argued October 23, 1936 —

Decided January 22, 1937.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is printed in 13 N.J. Mis. R. 779.

For the respondents, Samuel Rosenthal.

For the appellant, Frank A. Boettner and Jules E. Tepper.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, COLE, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Dornbusch v. Board Adjustment, Newark

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 22, 1937
189 A. 52 (N.J. 1937)
Case details for

Dornbusch v. Board Adjustment, Newark

Case Details

Full title:ROSE DORNBUSCH ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 22, 1937

Citations

189 A. 52 (N.J. 1937)
189 A. 52