From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dorn v. BMW of North America, Llc.

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Nov 2, 2010
Case No. 09-1027-WEB (D. Kan. Nov. 2, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 09-1027-WEB.

November 2, 2010


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Plaintiffs have filed a Motion for Extension of Time to File a Motion to Reconsider and to Vacate the Court's Order Regarding the Motion for Summary Judgment and the Motion to Exclude Expert Witness pursuant District of Kansas Rule 6.1(a) and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 59(e) or Rule 60(b)(6) (Doc. 67).

The district court is without authority to extend the time to file a motion pursuant to Rule 59(e) or Rule 60(b). Rule 6(b)(2), (A court must not extend the time to act under Rules 50(b) and (d), 52(b), 59(b), (d) and (e), and 60(b)); Collard v. United States, 10 F.3d 718, 719 (10th Cir. 1993).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File a Motion to Reconsider and to Vacate (Doc. 67) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED on this 1st day of November, 2010.


Summaries of

Dorn v. BMW of North America, Llc.

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Nov 2, 2010
Case No. 09-1027-WEB (D. Kan. Nov. 2, 2010)
Case details for

Dorn v. BMW of North America, Llc.

Case Details

Full title:Curtis Dorn and Ann Dorn, Plaintiffs, v. BMW of North America, LLC.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Kansas

Date published: Nov 2, 2010

Citations

Case No. 09-1027-WEB (D. Kan. Nov. 2, 2010)