From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dorman v. Twp. of Clinton

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jul 11, 2022
15-cv-12552 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 11, 2022)

Opinion

15-cv-12552

07-11-2022

MICHAEL DORMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. TOWNSHIP OF CLINTON, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S REQUEST TO EXCLUDE PUNITIVE DAMAGES

Hon. Matthew F. Leitman Judge

Defendant Clinton Township has requested that the Court bar Plaintiffs from seeking an award of punitive damages at trial under either 42 U.S.C. § 1983 or the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. The parties thereafter filed several supplemental briefs on this issue. (See Supp. Brs., ECF Nos. 163, 165, 167, 170, 171, 173, 174.) On July 11, 2022, the Court held an on-the-record status conference to discuss the punitive damages issue. For the reasons explained on the record during that conference, the Township's request is GRANTED. Absent further order of the Court, Plaintiffs shall not mention punitive damages at trial, and they shall not be permitted to seek an award of punitive damages from the jury.

It is further ordered that for the reasons explained on the record during the status conference, the July 12, 2022, trial in this matter is ADJOURNED.

Finally, Plaintiffs may file a motion asking the Court to certify its punitive damages ruling for an interlocutory appeal by no later than August 8, 2022 . The Township may file a response by no later than September 6, 2022 .

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Dorman v. Twp. of Clinton

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jul 11, 2022
15-cv-12552 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Dorman v. Twp. of Clinton

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL DORMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. TOWNSHIP OF CLINTON, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Jul 11, 2022

Citations

15-cv-12552 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 11, 2022)