From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dorival v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 4, 2000
768 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

Case No. 3D99-3012

Opinion filed October 4, 2000. July Term, A.D., 2000

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Stanford Blake, Judge; Lower Tribunal No. 97-26577.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Howard K. Blumberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Consuelo Maingot, Assistant Attorney General, and Kelly Cohen, Certified Legal Intern (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before COPE, GERSTEN, and GREEN, JJ.


We affirm the defendant's conviction in all respects. See U.S. v. Wilson, 425 U.S. 309 (1975); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.830 (1999). However, as the State concedes, there was a scrivener's error in the written judgment which stated that the defendant was found guilty of direct criminal contempt rather than indirect criminal contempt. Accordingly, we affirm and remand to the lower court to correct this error.

Affirmed and remanded.


Summaries of

Dorival v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 4, 2000
768 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Dorival v. State

Case Details

Full title:WEDNEL DORIVAL, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 4, 2000

Citations

768 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Graves v. State

This is particularly apparent from Mr. Graves's motion for rehearing, which reveals that he was aware that…