From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dore-Cockerham v. Town of Forestport

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 12, 2015
129 A.D.3d 1544 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

2015-06-12

Mary Dore–COCKERHAM, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. TOWN OF FORESTPORT, Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Norman I. Siegel, J.), entered March 18, 2014. The order denied the motion of defendant for summary judgment. Shantz & Belkin, Latham (Derek L. Hayden of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. Martin J. Kernan, Oriskany, for Plaintiff–Respondent.


Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Norman I. Siegel, J.), entered March 18, 2014. The order denied the motion of defendant for summary judgment.
Shantz & Belkin, Latham (Derek L. Hayden of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. Martin J. Kernan, Oriskany, for Plaintiff–Respondent.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court.

SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, and WHALEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dore-Cockerham v. Town of Forestport

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 12, 2015
129 A.D.3d 1544 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Dore-Cockerham v. Town of Forestport

Case Details

Full title:Mary Dore–COCKERHAM, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. TOWN OF FORESTPORT…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 12, 2015

Citations

129 A.D.3d 1544 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 5046
9 N.Y.S.3d 906