From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dore-Cockerham v. Town of Forestport

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
Jun 12, 2015
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 5046 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

756 CA 14-02166

06-12-2015

MARY DORE-COCKERHAM, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWN OF FORESTPORT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SHANTZ & BELKIN, LATHAM (DEREK L. HAYDEN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. MARTIN J. KERNAN, ORISKANY, FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.


PRESENT:

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Norman I. Siegel, J.), entered March 18, 2014. The order denied the motion of defendant for summary judgment.

SHANTZ & BELKIN, LATHAM (DEREK L. HAYDEN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MARTIN J. KERNAN, ORISKANY, FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court.

Entered: June 12, 2015

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court


Summaries of

Dore-Cockerham v. Town of Forestport

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
Jun 12, 2015
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 5046 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Dore-Cockerham v. Town of Forestport

Case Details

Full title:MARY DORE-COCKERHAM, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWN OF FORESTPORT…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

Date published: Jun 12, 2015

Citations

2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 5046 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)