From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dooley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Oct 1, 1996
930 S.W.2d 481 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 70084.

October 1, 1996.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, ST. CHARLES COUNTY, LUCY D. RAUCH, J.

James F. Dooley, Pacific, pro se.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, John M. Morris, III, Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent-respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.


ORDER


Petitioner Dooley appeals from the trial courts denial of his "NUNC PRO TUNC MOTION TO CORRECT THE ERRONEOUS PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT AS SUBMITTED IN CASE NUMBER CR186-1508FX." The trial court found that it lacked jurisdiction to grant the relief requested. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16 (b).


Summaries of

Dooley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Oct 1, 1996
930 S.W.2d 481 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Dooley v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES F. DOOLEY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSOURI…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Oct 1, 1996

Citations

930 S.W.2d 481 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)