From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dooley v. Hay Foundry and Iron Works

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 6, 1916
113 N.E. 1054 (N.Y. 1916)

Opinion

Argued May 12, 1916

Decided June 6, 1916

Theodore H. Lord and Lyman A. Spalding for appellant.

Rutherford B. Meyer and Eugene Lamb Richards for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN, SEABURY and POUND, JJ.


Summaries of

Dooley v. Hay Foundry and Iron Works

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 6, 1916
113 N.E. 1054 (N.Y. 1916)
Case details for

Dooley v. Hay Foundry and Iron Works

Case Details

Full title:MARY DOOLEY, as Administratrix of the Estate of JAMES DOOLEY, Deceased…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 6, 1916

Citations

113 N.E. 1054 (N.Y. 1916)
113 N.E. 1054