From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Donnelly v. Rochester Gas and Electric Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 21, 1964
21 A.D.2d 740 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Opinion

May 21, 1964

Appeal from the Monroe Special Term.

Present — Williams, P.J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Del Vecchio, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied, without costs. Memorandum: It is not clear that the plaintiff cannot recover from the defendant Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation on the basis of passive negligence. That being so, the second cause of action in the third-party complaint was improperly dismissed as insufficient in law. This is particularly so when the cause of action which was dismissed is viewed in the light of 3013 and subdivision (a) of 3017 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules. (See, also, 3 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N.Y. Civ. Prac., par. 3013.03; also Foley v. D'Agostino, 21 A.D.2d 60.)


Summaries of

Donnelly v. Rochester Gas and Electric Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 21, 1964
21 A.D.2d 740 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)
Case details for

Donnelly v. Rochester Gas and Electric Corp.

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD DONNELLY, Plaintiff, v. ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 21, 1964

Citations

21 A.D.2d 740 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Citing Cases

Richardson v. Coy

( Heckscher v. Edenborn, 203 N.Y. 210, 220; 20 N.Y. Jur., Equity, § 26.) We do not rule out the possibility…

Pimm v. Utilities Contractors, Inc.

Order unanimously reversed and motion denied, all without costs. Memorandum: We said in Donnelly v. Rochester…