From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doniger v. Norton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1932
235 App. Div. 704 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Opinion

February, 1932.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ.


Judgment modified by striking from the last paragraph thereof the words "on the merits" and by inserting in place thereof the words "without prejudice." In a new action it may be proved that money damages will amply compensate defendant, under the doctrine of Lacov v. Ocean Ave. Building Corp. ( 257 N.Y. 362) and equities in favor of the plaintiff in respect to the present and former character of the neighborhood may be more clearly established. As so modified the judgment is unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent. The direction for judgment contained in the decision is modified accordingly.


Summaries of

Doniger v. Norton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1932
235 App. Div. 704 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for

Doniger v. Norton

Case Details

Full title:ISAAC A. DONIGER, Appellant, v. AMY A. NORTON, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1932

Citations

235 App. Div. 704 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Citing Cases

Empire Boulevard Bldrs., Inc., v. Spohn

The attitude of the plaintiff, in its pleading and on the trial, was that the original restrictive covenant…