From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dong v. Garland

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Aug 30, 2023
1:23-CV-6412 (AMD) (LB) (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 30, 2023)

Opinion

1:23-CV-6412 (AMD) (LB)

08-30-2023

TIANWEN DONG, Plaintiff, v. MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States; UR M. JADDOU, Director of United States Citizenship & Immigration Services; PATRICIA MENGES, Director of New York Asylum Office, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

ANN M. DONNELLY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

On August 22, 2023, the pro se plaintiff filed a complaint seeking a writ of mandamus to “compel action” on the plaintiff's asylum application. (ECF No. 1.) It is ORDERED that:

1. The United States Attorney, as attorney for the defendants, is directed to show cause on or before September 20, 2023 why a writ of mandamus should not be issued, serve a copy of the response on the plaintiff, and file proof of service with the Clerk of this Court.
2. On or before October 4, 2023, the plaintiff shall file a reply, if any, and file proof of service with the Clerk of this Court.
3. The plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) is GRANTED.
4. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to (i) serve a copy of this order, together with a copy of the complaint, on the defendants via electronic case filing, and (ii) mail a copy of this order to the plaintiff.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Dong v. Garland

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Aug 30, 2023
1:23-CV-6412 (AMD) (LB) (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 30, 2023)
Case details for

Dong v. Garland

Case Details

Full title:TIANWEN DONG, Plaintiff, v. MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General of the…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Aug 30, 2023

Citations

1:23-CV-6412 (AMD) (LB) (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 30, 2023)