From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dondero v. Ferranti

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford
Jan 3, 1939
3 A.2d 831 (N.H. 1939)

Opinion

No. 3043.

Decided January 3, 1939.

Hughes Burns, by brief, for the plaintiffs.

Thomas J. McGreal and Frank E. Blackburn, by brief, for the defendant.


This is a proceeding in which a common-law action of tort for embezzling funds and securities has been amended by a bill in equity for an accounting. The court's finding that justice required the allowance of the amendment is not to be set aside merely because the defendant thereby lost her right to a jury trial of the action at law. A suit for an accounting has advantages over an action at law, when, as claimed here, an accounting by the defendant is necessary to ascertain the extent of her indebtedness. Equity does not lose its jurisdiction over accounting and discovery by reason of the common law's adoption of equitable principles. Berry v. Whidden, 62 N.H. 473, 476.

Exceptions overruled.


Summaries of

Dondero v. Ferranti

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford
Jan 3, 1939
3 A.2d 831 (N.H. 1939)
Case details for

Dondero v. Ferranti

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH DONDERO a. v. MARY FERRANTI

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford

Date published: Jan 3, 1939

Citations

3 A.2d 831 (N.H. 1939)
90 N.H. 554

Citing Cases

Murphy Sons, Inc. v. Peters

It does not involve a common law accounting or a controverted equity so as to bring it within the exception…

Hampton v. Palmer

However, this does not deprive equity of jurisdiction in this case where multiple suits at law would involve…