Summary
denying petition for writ of mandamus complaining of actions or omissions of trial judge and defense counsel in criminal prosecution, for which direct appeal and postconviction relief are adequate remedies
Summary of this case from Hastings v. KrischerOpinion
No. 1D00-1005.
Opinion filed April 20, 2000.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus — Original Jurisdiction.
Steve Anthony Donald, pro se, petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for respondent.
Steve Anthony Donald petitions this court for a writ of mandamus, complaining of certain actions or omissions on the part of the trial judge and defense counsel in his criminal prosecution. We find that direct appeal and a motion for postconviction relief serve as adequate legal remedies to correct any of the described errors. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Hall v. Key, 476 So.2d 787 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).
BARFIELD, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.