From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Donah v. Prack

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 30, 2015
127 A.D.3d 1538 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

No. 519555.

04-30-2015

In the Matter of James DONAH, Petitioner, v. Albert PRACK, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, et al., Respondents.

 James Donah, Marcy, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents.


James Donah, Marcy, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents.

Before: PETERS, P.J., McCARTHY, GARRY and CLARK, JJ.

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

A correction officer unlocked the door to petitioner's cell to allow him access to the shower. A second officer followed and, as that officer approached the cell, petitioner made direct eye contact with him and forcefully threw open the door. To avoid being struck in the head and face, the officer raised his arm to absorb the impact. As a result of this incident, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with assaulting staff and engaging in violent conduct. He was found guilty of the charges following a tier III disciplinary hearing. The determination was later affirmed on administrative appeal and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the correction officer who prepared it and the related documentation, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Payne v. Corcimiglia, 98 A.D.3d 1175, 1175, 951 N.Y.S.2d 249 [2012] ; Matter of Cornelius v. Fischer, 98 A.D.3d 779, 780, 949 N.Y.S.2d 804 [2012] ). Petitioner's claims that the report was written in retaliation for prior grievances that he had filed, and that he hit the officer with the door by accident, presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Guillory v. Fischer, 111 A.D.3d 1005, 1005, 974 N.Y.S.2d 196 [2013] ; Matter of Fowler v. Fischer, 106 A.D.3d 1344, 1345, 965 N.Y.S.2d 254 [2013], lv. denied 21 N.Y.3d 865, 2013 WL 4838763 [2013] ). His remaining contentions have not been preserved for our review.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Donah v. Prack

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 30, 2015
127 A.D.3d 1538 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Donah v. Prack

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of James DONAH, Petitioner, v. Albert PRACK, as Director of…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 30, 2015

Citations

127 A.D.3d 1538 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
127 A.D.3d 1538
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 3601

Citing Cases

McMaster v. Annucci

The misbehavior reports and related documentation, including the positive test results and the hearing…

Harriott v. Annucci

The misbehavior report, hearing testimony of its author and positive urinalysis test results provide…