From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dommerich v. Kelly

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 14, 1944
39 A.2d 30 (N.J. 1944)

Opinion

Argued May 16, 1944 —

Decided September 14, 1944.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 130 N.J.L. 542.

For the prosecutors-appellants, Milton, McNulty Augelli ( John Milton, of counsel).

For the defendant-respondent, Walter D. Van Riper, Attorney-General ( William A. Moore, of counsel).


This is an appeal from a Supreme Court judgment on certiorari affirming a decree of the Prerogative Court imposing a transfer inheritance tax upon certain gifts inter vivos made by the decedent, Otto L. Dommerich. On certiorari, in matters of this character, it is the Supreme Court's prerogative and duty to find the facts. It is argued here that the Supreme Court did not find the facts independently of the Prerogative Court but merely approved the fact findings of that court. We cannot accept this view but think that the Supreme Court sufficiently found the facts and made its own conclusions thereon. That being so, the fact issue of whether the transfers were made in anticipation of death is res adjudicata and it is not open to us to arrive at a different fact conclusion (even on the assumption that we would be inclined so to do were we empowered to make an independent investigation and appraisal) so long as there was evidence to sustain the findings of fact of the Supreme Court.

The judgment under review is accordingly affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, PORTER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, DILL, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Dommerich v. Kelly

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 14, 1944
39 A.2d 30 (N.J. 1944)
Case details for

Dommerich v. Kelly

Case Details

Full title:CAROLINE C. DOMMERICH, LOUIS F. DOMMERICH AND THE NATIONAL CITY BANK OF…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Sep 14, 1944

Citations

39 A.2d 30 (N.J. 1944)
39 A.2d 30

Citing Cases

Newberry v. Walsh

See Marx, The Switching of Settlors in Inter VivosTrusts, 26 Taxes 622 (1948). Our courts have long taken the…

Laube v. Zink

The appellant further refers to testimony that the decedent was of jovial disposition, attended to his…