From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dominion Retail, Inc. v. Rogers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 9, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-233 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 9, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-233

11-09-2012

DOMINION RETAIL, INC., Plaintiff, v. TIM ROGERS, et al., Defendants.


Judge Cathy Bissoon

Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy


MEMORANDUM ORDER

Magistrate Judge Eddy's Order dated October 3, 2012 (Doc. 70) is a nondispositive ruling. See Continental Cas. Co. v. Dominick D'Andrea, Inc., 150 F.3d 245, 250-51 (3d Cir. 1998) (holding same regarding motion for leave to amend). Having carefully reviewed Judge Eddy's supporting Memorandum and Opinion (Doc. 69), Defendants' Objections (Doc. 81), and Plaintiff's Response thereto (Doc. 87), the Court concludes that the October 3rd Order was neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) (reciting standard of review for magistrate judges' nondispositive rulings). Accordingly, Defendants' Objections (Doc. 81) are OVERRULED, and the Order of Judge Eddy dated October 3, 2102 (Doc. 70) is AFFIRMED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

Cathy Bissoon

United States District Judge
cc (via ECF email notification): All Counsel of Record


Summaries of

Dominion Retail, Inc. v. Rogers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 9, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-233 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Dominion Retail, Inc. v. Rogers

Case Details

Full title:DOMINION RETAIL, INC., Plaintiff, v. TIM ROGERS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Nov 9, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-233 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 9, 2012)