holding that structure must "fall together" or "fall in" to constitute "collapse" within insurance policy
Summary of this case from Weiner v. Selective Way InsuranceNo. 0309 M.D 1997.
March 18, 1998.
Pa.Super., 692. A.2d 188.
Denied.
holding that structure must "fall together" or "fall in" to constitute "collapse" within insurance policy
Summary of this case from Weiner v. Selective Way Insurancenoting that because the Superior Court's "formal purpose is to maintain and effectuate the decisional law of our [S]upreme [C]ourt as faithfully as possible," we are not authorized to create or adopt a new standard
Summary of this case from Toney v. Chester County HospFull title:DOMINICK v. STATESMAN INS. CO
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Mar 18, 1998
Contrastingly, a subsequent decision by the New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division shows that New…
Walsh v. StrenzA wrongful death action in Pennsylvania did not exist under the common law, but is a statutory cause of…