Opinion
DOCKET NO. CA 16-01638 DOCKET NO. CA 16-02017
12-07-2016
NICHOLAS DOMINICK AND LORRAINE J. DOMINICK, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. CHARLES MILLAR & SON CO., CHARLES MILLAR SUPPLY, INC., MILLAR SUPPLY, INC., PACEMAKER MILLAR STEEL & INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY COMPANY, INC., MILLAR SUPPLY, INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO CHARLES MILLAR & SON SUPPLY, INC., PACEMAKER MILLAR STEEL & INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY OF BINGHAMTON, INC., PACEMAKER STEEL & ALUMINUM OF BINGHAMTON CORP., AND PACEMAKER STEEL AND PUMP CO., INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR TO CHARLES MILLAR PACEMAKER STEEL WAREHOUSE INC. DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
PRESENT:
Appellants Charles Millar & Son Co., Charles Millar Supply Inc., and Pacemaker Millar Steel & Industrial Supply Company, Inc. having moved for an extension of time to file and serve a reply brief on the appeals taken herein from an order and a judgment of the Supreme Court entered in the Office of the Clerk of the County of Oneida on December 3, 2015, and March 22, 2016,
Now, upon reading and filing the affirmation of Teresa A. Monroe, Esq., dated November 22, 2016, the notice of motion with proof of service thereof, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is hereby ORDERED that the motion is granted on the condition that the reply brief is filed and served on or before December 23, 2016, and the Clerk is directed to accept the brief for filing.
Entered: December 7, 2016
Frances E. Cafarell, Clerk